Sunday, February 2, 2014

Bridging the gaps: Are inter-sect marriages a possible solution to sectarian intolerance?



1950… Kohat Valley… inter-sect marriage.

The bride’s cousins opposed the union. There were threats of a 20 year boycott. There were orders that no cleric should read the Nikaah. But then there was a twist – most certainly.
It was an arranged match.

Seventy year old Brig (retd) Talat Imtiaz Naqvi, former principal at Garrison Cadet College Kohat, joyfully shares the story of his maternal uncle and aunt who are also his in-laws.

 “My uncle (Shia) was the most educated bachelor in town, and my aunt’s father, a Sunni man, wanted to marry his daughter to this Shia youth.” The marriage thus took place and lasts till date, he said proudly.

Also the opposition was not due to the most popular notion of our days- sectarianism. According to Brig Naqvi, it was the case of love interest. “One of my aunt’s cousins himself wished to marry her, hence, the hue and cry.”

Brig Naqvi’s both paternal and maternal sides of the family have a history of successful inter-sect marriages, and Brig Naqvi believes, in light of experience, that such bonds help dissolve the hostilities that may have developed between the followers of different sects. “The very essence of this relationship (of marriage) helps build a bridge between sects.” Sharing his personal example, he said, “Even after decades of our marriage, my wife still offers Namaz in a Sunni manner, because she was brought up by a Sunni mother, and this was never a big deal in our house.”

Brig Naqvi believes that the problem does not lie in the institute of marriage but the value system of society. “It is ironic,” he said, “that while we, as a society, are becoming more educated and technologically advanced, we are losing the value of tolerance when it comes to sectarianism.”

It’s 2013, and towards south of the country, Karachi, it’s the month of Moharram,
In a typical Shia mourning gathering, there is something not so very typical about it. The attendees of the majlis are not all clad in black. 

Nisa Fatima, a 47 year old Shia woman, married to a Sunni man, holds a majlis every year which is attended even by her in-laws. “My in-laws are from a different sect but even they believe in the sacrifice of Imam Hussain a.s, and so it was never a problem for me to carry on with this tradition.”

Originally from Jacobabad, Fatima also comes from a family with a history of intersect marriages, and is clueless why society doesn’t accept such unions. “It’s simply an incorrect mindset,” said Fatima, “with one God, and myriads of similarities in practice and beliefs, is there really logic behind this divide?” she asks. 

Samra Raza, a 50 year old housewife in Karachi, shares a similar experience, but with some rough memories to go along with it. As a Sunni woman who married a Shia man in the 1980s, Samra had to face the all-too-known opposition from her family. “My grandmother used to follow Shia rituals like Koonday and going to the Imambargah, but then somewhere down the line it all disappeared.” 

Samra recalls that for her the struggle to get married into another sect lasted for almost five years, and even today “the struggle goes on”. “It’s not about the in-laws,” she said, “I never converted and my in-laws embraced me as I am. However, getting married into a different community means interacting with the entire community, and you find all sorts of people everywhere.”

For Samra, for a marriage to become a bridge between sects, the key component is will-power. “If you enter into it, go through with it, as it is a huge responsibility you are taking up to create a peaceful society.”

Sect of the offspring?
Marriages are strongly linked with the idea of procreation, and hence comes the very core dilemma of intersect marriages – the sect of children. 

Sana*, 23, with her parents belonging to two different sects, believes that “having two sects in a home does not make it a war zone.” The key factor Sana shared is “no discussion on controversial topics at home.”

It was only in her late teens that the sectarian difference became known to Sana and that too due to peer pressure at school. “My friends used to talk about things (religious rituals) I didn’t know anything about,” said Sana (her school was a sect based community school.)

With a Shia father and Sunni mother, Sana personally feels it’s not important to pick any one sect for herself. “I don’t want to choose a side; I am a Muslim and nothing else.” However, she does acknowledge that “even if you don’t want to, the society will do that for you.”

For Aurangzeb Khan, 22, the choice was clearly defined by the age of twelve. Having a bent towards his mother’s sect, Shiaism, Khan feels his father initially had some reservations about his decision.

“When I offered my first namaz, my father asked me if it was the correct way, and I replied, ‘Hands down or folded, all I know is that I am standing before one God’.” However, somewhere down the line, said Khan, his father started encouraging him to follow Shia traditions. “I think we have now reached our balancing point.”

Khan hails from a business class Sindhi family. Passionate about his religious beliefs, Khan acknowledges having verbal skirmishes with his paternal cousins over contentious matters like doctrine of Khilafat (Sunni) and Imamat (Shia). “There have been instances of heated debate, but things never got out of hand.”

Outside family, Khan has had a mixed experience. Khan does not feel discriminated against, but often gets questioned about his identity. “‘How come having a Sunni father, you follow the Shia traditions?’ is one question I am asked often by friends,” he said with a smile. 

For Sana*, the struggle has always been more external than internal. “My classmates used to make me feel like a Martian because I wasn’t like them. I don’t want to be like them, I have been bought up in a broader mindset and I cannot be a hypocrite.”

Scholarly viewpoint
Abdul Rahman Qureshi, former director of an Islamic centre, Association Interculturelle des Pakistanais en France (AIPF) in Paris, firmly supports the idea of intersect marriages. 

“This tradition dates back long in the history of the sub-continent and can be a positive source to bring tolerance in our society.” 

For Qureshi, more than sectarian differences, the society is plagued with a rigid mindset which does not even allow marriages between two persons from sub-groups of the same sect.

Qureshi also believes that use of the term sect for Shia and Sunni is a flawed practice. “Both believe in and follow the same foundations of the same religion and so qualify as two schools thought instead of sects.” 

The approach of education of the Muslim young generation, according to Qureshi, should be based, even without marriages, on the mutual respect of all the religions and tolerance towards their followers. “This education first begins at home and then at religious circles,” he said, “and when they reach the age of forming opinions on reason and knowledge they are free to choose their own way.”
Some clerics, however refrain from recommending the practice lest it becomes a trend, even though they agree that there is a broader consensus that the act in itself is permissible. 

Maulana Murtaza Karbalai, a Shia cleric, feels that even though there are many common grounds on which the two major sects of the country can unite, inter-sect marriage is not a very strong solution. “When it comes to inter-sect marriages, routine social and economic conflicts of a married life become associated with difference of sects of the spouses.” 

For Maulana Karbalai, in case of a bad experience in an inter-sect marriage, there is a greater tendency for the parties to view the entire sect through the prism of resentment.
                                                             
*Sana- the name has been changed as requested by the source.

(edited version published on Dawn.com on 31-1-2014)

No comments:

Post a Comment